🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have decided to pull out from an global treaty created to safeguard women from abuse, covering domestic abuse, following extensive and intense debates in the legislature.

Several thousand of protesters assembled in the capital this past week to oppose the vote. The final authority now rests with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to approve or veto the proposed law.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only took effect in Latvia last year, mandating governments to develop legal frameworks and support services to eliminate all types of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the initial EU country to initiate the procedure of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation pulled out in 2021, a decision that human rights organizations described as a significant regression for gender equality.

Political Controversy and Opposition

The international agreement was ratified by the EU in last year, yet traditionalist groups have contended that its emphasis on gender equality undermines family values and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Latvian parliament, MPs voted 56 to 32 to withdraw from the convention, a action sponsored by political opponents but backed by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a setback for moderate conservative Prime Minister Evika Silina, who joined demonstrators outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that violence does not triumph," she declared to the crowd.

Political Divisions and Reactions

One of the primary parties supporting the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose leader has urged citizens to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

The nation's ombudswoman Karina Palkova appealed for the treaty not to be politicized, while the group the rights organization asserted it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The recent decision has sparked widespread outcry both within the country and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a Latvian appeal calling for the treaty to be preserved. The gender equality group the rights center has called a demonstration for the coming week, charging lawmakers of ignoring the wishes of the Latvian people.

International Worries and Possible Future Actions

The leader of the Council of Europe's legislative body commented that the Baltic state had made a rash decision driven by misinformation. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying regression for women's rights and human rights in Europe".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation left the treaty in 2021, cases of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not achieve a two-thirds majority, the head of state could possibly return the legislation for further consideration if he has concerns.

President the national leader announced on digital platforms that he would assess the decision according to constitutional requirements, "considering state and legal considerations, instead of ideological or political perspectives".

Recently, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, indicated it would not exclude petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a concerning development for gender equality not only in our nation but throughout Europe," commented a rights advocate.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in multiple EU nations
• The Istanbul Convention mandates specific safeguards for survivors of gender-based violence
• The nation's vote could affect comparable debates in additional member states