🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.