🔗 Share this article

SCertain fixtures feel mismatched. Maybe it’s just about conceivable that, had things gone slightly otherwise in the 1970s, Malcolm Allison or another manager leading their team behind the Soviet Bloc for a crack at Valeriy Lobanovskyi’s cybernauts, but Dynamo Kyiv against Crystal Palace remains a fixture that provokes a second look. It feels like a mismatch: how can those teams even be in the identical competition?

However this is the modern world. Ukraine is battling invasion, its sides diminished. The Premier League is incredibly rich. And Crystal Palace are coached by one of the emerging talents of the European game. They didn’t just play each other on the matchday, but Palace triumphed with a degree of ease. It was their third consecutive victory, their 19th straight game without defeat.

Coaching Rumors and Next Steps

Therefore, because no mid-size club can simply be allowed to enjoy a good run, all the talk is of which club the Austrian manager could move to. His contract expires at the end of the season and he has refused to agree to an renewal. He is 51; if he is planning to lead a major team with the possibility of an long spell in charge, he lacks a huge amount of opportunity to secure a move. Could he then be the answer for the Red Devils? He indeed, after all, utilize the same formation as Ruben Amorim, just rather more successfully.

Strategic Formation and Cultural Background

This brings up the issue of the reason a system that has attracted so much scepticism at Old Trafford works so well at Selhurst Park. But it’s never only about the setup, nor is it the case – generally speaking – that one formation is inherently better than another. Instead certain tactical shapes, in conjunction with the manner they are enacted, prioritise particular aspects of the game. It is, at the minimum, intriguing that since the manager’s Toffees won the title in 1962-63 with a W-M, only one side has secured the English league title playing with a three-man defense: the Italian’s Chelsea in the 2016-17 season.

Antonio Conte’s team clinched the title in 2016-17 with a three defenders and effectively two attacking midfielders.

That success was something of a rare occurrence. Chelsea that season had no European football, allowing them more rested than their competitors, and they had squad members who fit the formation virtually remarkably well.

The French midfielder, with his stamina and reading of the play, is almost two players, and he was functioning at the back of the engine room together with either calming presence of Cesc Fàbregas and Nemanja Matic, one of the most incisive passers the Premier League has known. That provided the foundation for the two No 10s: the Belgian wizard, who revelled in his free position, and the Spanish forward, a expert of the run into the box. Every one of those individuals was improved by their partnership with the teammates.

Cultural Factors and Tactical Challenges

To an extent, the comparative absence of success for the back three, at minimum in terms of claiming championships, is systemic. Few sides have won the title using a back three because not many clubs have adopted a back three. The global tournament win in 1966 cemented in the English football consciousness the effectiveness of defensive organization with a back four.

That remained the default, nearly without challenge, for the two decades that followed. But there may additionally be more specific tactical explanations. A three-man backline gets its breadth from the wide players; it could be that the intense hard-running style of the British football makes the requirement on those individuals excessive to be maintained regularly.

However the 3-4-2-1 poses specific difficulties. It is solid, providing the compact structure – three central defenders protected by defensive midfielders – that is widely recognised as the most effective way to defend against opposition counterattacks. But that is just a single aspect of the game. If they advance forward from the cover of the three centre‑backs, considering the common use of setups with a central trio, two central midfielders will tend to be outmanned without backup from elsewhere – unless a single player has the exceptional abilities of Kanté.

The striker celebrates after netting his team’s additional goal against the Ukrainian side.

Strengths and Limitations of the Approach

The very stability of that tight defensive block, additionally, while an advantage for a team looking to absorb attacks, becomes a potential disadvantage for a side that seek to take the game to the rival. Its biggest strength is also its greatest flaw. The rigid nature of the formation, the way the center is divided into defensive players and attack-minded players – all No 6s and attacking mids in modern terminology, with no No 8s – means that without a individual to step between lines there is a risk of being read easily; once more, the Blues had the ideal man to do that, the Brazilian defender frequently striding ahead from the defense to act as an additional central presence.

Contrasting Styles at Selhurst and United

Palace aren’t concerned about possession. They have the second-lowest ball control of any side in the Premier League. It’s not at all their role to have the ball. And that is the main reason why a direct comparison with United’s struggles is challenging. United, by tradition and by expectation, can not be the team with the second-lowest ball retention in the league.

Although United chose to play on the break against other top clubs, the majority of their matches will be against opponents who defend deeply and would be happy enough with a draw. In most games there is an pressure on them to control the play.

Perhaps a attacking-minded team can play a 3-4-2-1 but it requires very particular players – as the Italian coach had at Chelsea. The Austrian’s achievement with it has arrived at Wolfsburg and the German clubs, where he has been in a position to have his team defend compactly and break at pace.

Palace have beaten Aston Villa and West Ham, because most teams do at the moment, held the Blues, and torn Liverpool apart on the break. But they’ve also tied at Selhurst Park to Sunderland and Sunderland, and found it hard to overcome the Norwegian side. Sit deep against Palace and they have difficulty for creativity.

Adaptation and Future Scenarios

Could the manager adjust if he moved